When I was a practicing architect and a structural problem arose I would ask my engineer friend, Emmanuel Leon, for advice. Once I was designing a house which required a long span. In his pragmatic Filipino way he asked me, “Do you want it cheap or architectural?” (I wanted the latter and he designed an upside-down king post truss.) I thought of Emmanuel when I walked into Penn Station in New York recently. It was my first trip on Amtrak in several years, and I was looking forward to seeing the much lauded station hall, which is in the old Farley post office building. I was disappointed. For one thing, the space was small. My train had left Philadelphia’s Thirtieth Street Station (designed by Graham, Anderson, Probst & White in 1927-33), which has a majestic hall, and this space was puny by comparison. And the steel trusses overhead were definitely utilitarian rather than architectural (they had originally spanned the mailroom). I had read plaudits about the suspended clock in the center of the hall, designed by Peter Pennoyer. It is very handsome, and it highlights one of the main drawbacks of its surroundings; unlike the clock, or Thirtieth Street Station, for that matter, the new station has no sense of style. The generic architecture (designed by SOM) could be an office building lobby or a shopping mall just about anywhere. And unlike Thirtieth Street, which has long oak benches, there is nowhere to sit except a claustrophobic “waiting room.” So passengers sprawl on the floor. Not attractive. Did I mention that it’s called Moynihan Hall, after the great senator? The name is displayed everywhere, over and over again, as if that would make up for the pedestrian design. Moynihan, who had an eye for architecture, would wince.